History of IAS 28 (as amended in 2011) DateĮxposure Draft E28 Accounting for Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures IAS 39 - Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.IAS 37 - Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets.IAS 35 - Discontinuing Operations (Superseded).IAS 32 - Financial Instruments: Presentation.IAS 30 - Disclosures in the Financial Statements of Banks and Similar Financial Institutions.IAS 29 - Financial Reporting in Hyperinflationary Economies.IAS 28 - Investments in Associates (2003).IAS 28 - Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures (2011).IAS 27 - Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements (2008).IAS 27 - Separate Financial Statements (2011).IAS 26 - Accounting and Reporting by Retirement Benefit Plans.IAS 22 - Business Combinations (Superseded).IAS 21 - The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates.IAS 20 - Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance.IAS 19 - Employee Benefits (1998) (superseded).IAS 15 - Information Reflecting the Effects of Changing Prices (Withdrawn).IAS 14 - Segment Reporting (Superseded).IAS 10 - Events After the Reporting Period.IAS 8 - Accounting Policies, Changes in Accounting Estimates and Errors.IAS 1 - Presentation of Financial Statements.He urged any concerned subscriber to to call the Icstis help line on 0800 500212. Icstis chairman Sir Peter North said that just a few firms had caused huge numbers of complaints. Icstis imposed fines totalling £140,000 against 94 firms during 1999, and bars on access to the telephone system were imposed against 54. Icstis received 1,250 complaints about Allocation, which was fined £2,000. The vast majority was made up of 50,000 mobile telephones, each costing £17 a month. Icstis said just a small number of the available prizes were worthwhile. The "winners" then had to call a premium number, charged at £1 a minute, and listen to a nine-minute message. In the case of Allocation Hotline Group, millions of leaflets were sent to private homes last autumn telling occupants they had won a competition prize. Intacc, along with a second, less serious, case accounted for nearly a third of all complaints received last year by Icstis, its report disclosed today. They cannot be named as both trading standards officers and police have inquiries under way. In addition, two individuals associated with Intacc have been banned from running or being associated with a premium telephone service until September 23 this year. Intacc has now been barred from all circuits and has been fined £5,000. ![]() The Intacc case was one of the most serious ever handled by Icstis, the agency that regulates premium phone services. ![]() The telecommunications service provider, Telecom One, held on to the money earned and refunded the more than 750 people concerned. Within two hours of the line being opened last September, 500 complaints had poured in, and it was halted. While Intacc was not trying falsely to claim the sums on the "debt collection" letters, it was trying to make thousands of pounds from the premium-cost phone number the "debtors" were ordered to call.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |